Cambridge Entomological Club, 1874
PSYCHE

A Journal of Entomology

founded in 1874 by the Cambridge Entomological Club
Quick search

Print ISSN 0033-2615
This is the CEC archive of Psyche through 2000. Psyche is now published by Hindawi Publishing.

Albro T. Gaul.
Experiments in Housing Vespine Colonies, with Notes on the Homing and Toleration Instincts of Certain Species.
Psyche 48(1):16-19, 1941.

This article at Hindawi Publishing: https://doi.org/10.1155/1941/48582
CEC's scan of this article: http://psyche.entclub.org/pdf/48/48-016.pdf, 316K
This landing page: http://psyche.entclub.org/48/48-016.html


The following unprocessed text is extracted automatically from the PDF file, and is likely to be both incomplete and full of errors. Please consult the PDF file for the complete article.

Psyche
[March
EXPERIMENTS IN HOUSING VESPINE COLONIES, WITH NOTES ON THE HOMING AND TOLERATION
INSTINCTS OF CERTAIN SPECIES
BY ALBRO TILTON GAUL
Brooklyn, N. Y.
During the summer of 1939 I made the following obser- vations on some species of the Vespinse at Lakeville, Conn. The work was not begun until early July when the wasp season had fairly advanced.
Wasp nests were captured intact, anaesthetized and trans- ported to the laboratory for observation (1). Hives were built to accommodate the various nests. These were wooden cases built into the open window apertures, and securely fastened and weatherstripped to keep the wasps out of the laboratory. Each hive was divided into several compartments by heavy cardboard partitions ; each compartment provided a home for a single nest of hornets. The window face of the hive consisted of wire screening to admit air and light, and an adjustable aperture on the floor of the hive to control the egress of the hornets. In the laboratory each compartment was accessible through a slid- ing panel, with a glass observation window and a trapdoor. Nests were placed in compartments in positions as nearly normal as possible.
When the anaesthetized colony was first placed in the hive, the aperture had to be closed to prevent the escape of the wasps. Unless this precaution were taken, the whole adult population of the nest would desert as soon as they were able to move. In one such case, the population was discovered rebuilding a nest within a few feet of the old nest site, although this was well over a mile from the laboratory. This desire to desert the nest only lasted a few hours; a colony collected in the early evening could be permitted to gather food and paper pulp next morning. Pachc 48:16-19 (194 1). hup //psyche cnlclub nrgt48148-016 html



================================================================================

19411 Experiments in Vespine Colonies 17 About eight hours of confinement sufficed to persuade the adults to remain with the nest and continue their normal activities.
Once established in the new environment, a colony would not voluntarily desert despite further treatment with anses- thetic. One colony of D'olichovespula arenaria Fab. was periodically treated with ether that I might remove a portion of the nest wall for observation purposes. These did not leave the nest although they were free to do so. As a result of enlarging the nest, one colony of Dolicho- vespula maculata Linn. expanded the brood comb until it came into contact with the observation window in the hive. The paper nest wall was removed by the wasps and the glass served as the wall. A similar observation was figured by A. H. Clark (2). This is evidently a normal method of building the nest into contact with any surface, as nests collected from rafters and walls of buildings exhibit the same structure.
Customarily new comb is built below the existing tiers of comb. In the circumscribed space of the compartments this could not be done, so the hornets increased the area of each comb by adding cells to the periphery.
Because of the limited vertical expansion in the compart- ments, some of the Dolichovespula colonies were forced to use the floor of the hive as the nest floor, without any paper. Lacking any excavating instinct, the wasps made no effort to remove the floor of the hive.
The nests gradually assumed a hemispherical shape. In these nests, the entrance was eventually made opposite the escape aperture of the hive and on the floor of the hive. Old wasp comb and paper was supplied to assist certain colonies in gathering paper material. None would accept this paper.
Species of Vespula will also respond to hive conditions without the accustomed dampness of the earth. Few notes were made on this genus as observations were made too late in the season.
Wasps returning from the fields invariably return directly to the home window. In many cases, however, they would fail to .select the proper hive compartment. Even when there were two or more species in a hive, they would re-



================================================================================

18 Psyche [March
peatedly enter the wrong compartment. This was so com- mon throughout the season that a number of the wasps must have made the same error many times. I can only offer the explanation that the nests are never in such close proximity in nature, and that a return to within a few inches would normally bring a wasp to her nest. But in the hive, all compartments look alike, a nest odor (if any) is con-
fused with the odor from adjacent nests, and a few inches error would send a wasp into the wrong compartment. Eventually, of course, the wasps would seek out their home nest.
The continued intrusion of wasps into the wrong com- partments afforded excellent opportunities to observe the natural tolerance and animosity of the various species toward the intruders. The results are very similar to tolerance observations on Polistes (3).
In one hive were two maculata nests and a weakened arenaria nest. In this hive a returning macuhta worker would be set upon if she ventured into the arenaria compart- ment; similarly an arenaria intruder would be pursued in the macztlata compartments. Members of one maculata colony were permitted to enter the compartment and to walk upon the nest of the other colony; they did not enter the nest of the other colony. As a result of removing work- ers from the arenaria colony, the remaining population could no longer protect itself and the intruding maculata workers soon learned to steal the arenaria larvae as food for their own brood.
Two adjacent arenaria colonies in another hive permitted the same freedom of trespass on their nests as was de- scribed above for the two maculata colonies. In flight outside the hives all the species were on good terms. They caused no trouble by virtue of their prox- imity.
To discover the outcome of a prolonged intrusion of one species in the compartment of another, I closed the escape aperture of an arenaria hive and placed a large maculata worker within the arenaria nest. Immediately the arenaria workers formed a circle about the intruder, always facing her and reminding me of the entourage of worker bees about their queen. As soon as the maculata moved toward the



================================================================================

19411 Experiments in Vespine Colonies 19 screening in an attempt to escape, an arenaria worker jumped upon her back and attempted to bite off the wings, all the while flexing her abdomen in an attempt to sting the intruder. After this, several "defenders7' would dart for- ward and nip at the legs, antennae and wings and return to the circle. This darting and biting continued until the first worker succeeded in injecting her sting, which con- cluded hostilities. Even after death, the intruder was wor- ried and chewed by occasional wasps. The workers re- moved the dead macdata from the hive five days after the battle.
The maculata made no effort to defend itself. Aside from moving to escape, it submitted to its fate. Subsequent simi- lar experiments with intruding arenaria workers on macu- lata nests resulted in the same results for the intruder. It thus seems that members of one species of Dolicho- vespula will tolerate guests of the same species, while they are actively hostile to the intruders of another species. They are not loath to prey upon the larvae of another species and will enter the other nest to do so if permitted. 1. Gaul, A. T.
A Method of Collecting Nests of Some Social Hymen- optera-Bull. Brooklyn Entorn. Soe. Vol. 34, 1939, pp. 197-8. 2. Clark, A. H. Potent Personalities, Wasps and Hornets-Nat. Geog. Mag. July 1937 pp. 70-1.
3. Rau, Phil The Instinct of Animosity and Tolerance in Queen
Polistes Wasps-Jour. Comp. Psychology, Vol. 27, 1939,
pp. 259-69.




================================================================================


Volume 48 table of contents