Cambridge Entomological Club, 1874
PSYCHE

A Journal of Entomology

founded in 1874 by the Cambridge Entomological Club
Quick search

Print ISSN 0033-2615
This is the CEC archive of Psyche through 2000. Psyche is now published by Hindawi Publishing.

F. M. Carpenter.
Redescription of Parapaolia superba (Scudder) (Protorthoptera).
Psyche 58(3):108-110, 1951.

This article at Hindawi Publishing: https://doi.org/10.1155/1951/48296
CEC's scan of this article: http://psyche.entclub.org/pdf/58/58-108.pdf, 228K
This landing page: http://psyche.entclub.org/58/58-108.html


The following unprocessed text is extracted automatically from the PDF file, and is likely to be both incomplete and full of errors. Please consult the PDF file for the complete article.

REDESCRIPTION OF PARAPAOLIA SUPERBA
(SCUDDER) (PROTORTHOPTERA)
BY F. M. CARPENTER
Harvard University
In a general account of Palaeozoic insects, published in 1885, Scudder included keys to species of certain genera related to Dictyoneura (Palaeodictyoptera) . One of the species mentioned under the genus Paolia was designated as new and named superba. The fossil was said by Scudder to have been collected at Mazon Creek, Illinois, by L. M. Umbach. Unfortunately, Scudder's description consisted of a single short sentence without the aid of a figure. What happened to the specimen after Scudder's examination of it is not clear; Handlirsch was unable to find it when he was preparing his revision of American Palaeozoic insects. At any rate, in 1918 it was in the possession of Dr. Umbach, who sold it at that time to the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago. Through the courtesy of the authorities of the Museum I have been able to borrow the fossil and to prepare the following redescription and illustration. For reasons given below, I am placing the species in the family Palaeocixiidae of the Order Protorthoptera. Genus Parapaolia Handlirsch
Parapaolia Handlirsch, 1906, Foss. Ins. : 121. This genus was erected for superba without mention of generic characteristics. It differs from Palaeocixius, to which it seems to be related, by having the media forked at about mid-wing, instead of at the level of the origin of Rs. Parapaolia superba (Scudder)
Figure 1
Paolia superba Scudder, 1885, Proc, Amer. Acad. Arts Sci., 20 :173. Parapaolia superba Handlirsch, 1906, Foss. Ins. :121.
Fore wing, length, 90 mm. ; width, 23 mm. Sc terminating 108




================================================================================

19511 Carpenter - Parapaolia superba 109 well beyond mid-wing. Rs arising in the proximal quarter of the wing, and having its first branch arising just be- yond mid-wing. CuA apparently free from M; anal veins unknown. Sc and Rs are distinctly concave in the obverse half of the fossil, and R is equally convex. M and its branches appear slightly concave, as is the case in most Protorthoptera.
The hind wing is very incompletely known; it apparently has a more rounded apex than the fore wing, and the radial sector arises nearer the middle of the wing, but the branching of Rs and M is apparently like that of the fore wing.
Figure 1. Parapaolia superba (Scudder). Fore and hind wings, drawn from holotype.
Holotype : Chicago Museum of Natural History; collected at Naperville, DuPage Co., Illinois, by Dr. L. M. Umbach. The fossil consists of two wings, with parts of the other two, superimposed and resting over the abdomen, no part of which can be distinctly seen.
Scudder placed this specimen in the Palaeodictyoptera,



================================================================================

110 Psyche [September
but since he arbitrarily assigned all Palaeozoic insects to that order, his system of classification is without phylo- genetic significance. Handlirsch, who, of course, had no real knowledge of the species, placed it in incertae sedis under the Palaeodictyoptera.
I have removed the species
from that order for two reasons: 1) the superimposed wings strongly indicate that the insect was neopterous; and 2) there is no convex anterior media, the division of the media being remote from the origin of M. The insect therefore seems most probably protorthopterous, though its family affiliation is not clear because of the poor preser- vation of the wing.
I have provisionally placed it in the
family Palaeocixiidae, since it shows some resemblance to Palaeocixius.
ADLERZIA FROGGATTI FOREL AND SOME NEW SYNONYMY (HYMENOPTERA :
FOKMICIDAE) - In another paper, now
in press, I have discussed the confusion attendant on For- el's description of Aderzia, based on a stray worker of a single species and wrongly placed as a subgenus of Mono- mo,~ium, It has since been determined that two subsequent- ly described ants placed in different genera represent differ- ent castes of A. froggatii. The following synonymy is sug- gested here in order to avert proposal of a new name for fienothorax McAreavey, which is preoccupied by Harris and by Agassiz :
A dierzia f roggatti Fore1
Moz o m orium (Aderzia) froggatti Forel, 1902, Rev. Suisse Zool., 10 : 445-447, worker [minor] ; original description. Machomgrma silvestrii Emery, 1914, Boll. Lab. Zool. Porti- ci, 8: 182, fig. 2, soldier; new synonymy. Stenothorax katerinae McAreavey, 1949, Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. Wales, 7.4:3-4, figs. 7-16, worker major [ergatoid?] ; worker minor; new synonymy.
Stenothorax McAreavey, nee Harris, nec Agassiz, with the genotype and sole species katerinae (loc. cit.) becomes an absolute synonym of Aderzia Forel by isogenotypy ; new synonymy. -BY WILLIAM L. BROWN, JR., Museum of Comparative Zoology.




================================================================================


Volume 58 table of contents