Cambridge Entomological Club, 1874
PSYCHE

A Journal of Entomology

founded in 1874 by the Cambridge Entomological Club
Quick search

Print ISSN 0033-2615
This is the CEC archive of Psyche through 2000. Psyche is now published by Hindawi Publishing.

K. Christiansen.
The Collembola of Lebanon and Western Syria. Part II. Families Cyphoderidae and Oncopoduriae.
Psyche 64(3):77-89, 1957.

This article at Hindawi Publishing: https://doi.org/10.1155/1957/32941
CEC's scan of this article: http://psyche.entclub.org/pdf/64/64-077.pdf, 996K
This landing page: http://psyche.entclub.org/64/64-077.html


The following unprocessed text is extracted automatically from the PDF file, and is likely to be both incomplete and full of errors. Please consult the PDF file for the complete article.

PSYCHE
Vol. 64 September, 1957 No. 3
pep-- -
THE COLLEMBOLA OF LEBANON
AND WESTERN SYRIA
PART 11.
FAMILIES CYPHODERIDAE AND ONCOPODURIDAE1 BY K. CHRISTIANSEN
Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa
In 1906 Borner described Cyvhodems assirnilis from material partly collected in Egypt. Since that time the family Cyphoderidae has been well represented in the col- lections from the region until at the present moment nine species have been recorded from Lebanon, Palestine, Egypt, and Iraq. Four of the nine species mentioned above were again recovered in the course of this research and two new species were uncovered. The relatively poor recovery of previously located species along with the extremely spotty nature of the distribution of the collections appears to indicate a small sampling of the total population of this family present in the area.
The family Oncopoduridae has not previously been re- ported from the area. The single new species described herein does not give any new insight into the biogeography of the region.
Genus Cyphoderus
Delamare-Deboutteville (1948) in his excellent work upon Termitophilous and Myrmecophilous Collembola di- vided the old genus Cyphodems into a number of genera. Since two of the species here examined indicated a clear need for the re-examination of these genera, I have con- Published with the aid of a grant from the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College. Part I (General Considerations and the Fam- ily Onychiuridae) was published in Psyche 63 (4) : 119-133, 1956. Pswhr 64:77-89 (1957). hup //psyche einclub orgtW64-077.html



================================================================================

78 Psyche [September
sidered his genera as subgenera (Cyphoda and Serroderus) throughout, merely to avoid confusion. Three species had been previously recorded from Lebanon. In the present work two of these were re-discovered, and species pre- viously recorded from Egypt and Palestine were found. Along with one new species, this brings the total known from the area to six species.
Cyphoderus genneserae Carpenter
Cyphoderus genneserae Carpenter, 1913, Jour. Proc. Asiat. Soc. Bengal 9 :2l5
This species is fairly widespread throughout the south- western Syrian Region. Handschin and Carpenter re- ported it from Palestine and the variation described by Handschin as "aethiopica" has been found in several regions in Central Africa. I have recovered the species from two localities: Litani River near the mouth on August 23, 1953 (Asfour and Salaymeh Coll.) and Ante- lias Stream Bank on November 9, 1952. Both of these localities are in the coastal plain of Lebanon and all of
the specimens
(about 25) agree with the descriptions and figures shown in Handschin, except in one startling re- spect: The presence of only two fringed scales in the inner row of dental scales. This characteristic places the species in the genus Serroderus of Delamare, although it lacks any hint of the gradation between scale and seta structure described as characteristic of the genus. The species of this genus which it most resembles is S. sub- limis and this species also lacks the above mentioned characteristics. In spite of the difficulty of separating the specimens at hand from the last mentioned species I feel that the exact detail for detail identity of the present form with the described genneserae leaves little doubt that the existence of only a single pair of internal scales is a local variation. This, of course, points up the neces- sity of revising the limitations of the genus Serroderus, but this is beyond the scope of the present paper. The only other modification of Handschin's description is that in a few specimens the tenent hair can be seen to have a minutely clavate tip, visible only under the highest magnifi-



================================================================================

19571 Christiansen - Collembola of Lebanon 79 cation. In both populations the aethiopica type of mucronal form was present in addition to the normal type. Cyphoderus (Cyphoda) grassei
Cassagnau & Delamare-Deboutteville
Cyphoda grassei, Cassagnau & Delamare, 1951, Biospeologica 75 : 384-385. This species was described by Cassagnau and Delamare from a single specimen. The relative size of the mucro and dens (1-10) was taken as a characteristic of the species and upon this basis it was placed in the genus Cyphoda. I have several series of specimens which I have identified as this species. In one of these I have five specimens. The relative sizes of the mucro and dens varying as fol- lows: 1-10, 1-9, I-8~5, 1-7.5, 1-7. In a second series of three specimens the sizes are:
1-10, 1-6, and 1-5.5. In still
a third series both specimens have a mucronal denies ratio of 1-5.5. This presents a problem since the sole basis for separation of members of the genus Cyphoda is the relative mucronal length. Whatever the eventual de- cision concerning this genus, the species grassei can no longer be considered part of the genus.
In addition to this variation in mucro the species shows another peculiarity in that the tunica is absent in a few specimens, particularly young forms. In over 95% of the specimens seen, a clear tunica is present on the ungues. Perhaps the most unique characteristic of the group is the shape of the mucro. This is particularly noticeable upon specimens having a relatively large mucro, but can be seen upon all. The mucro has in addition to the apical hook, a very shallow anteapical tooth. This con- dition is always the same and places it directly on a line between the two groups bidenticulati and inermes. Distribution: Hammana, Lebanon, August 28, 1952 and July 28, 1957. Vie. East Base Quornet es Sauda Lebanon, elev. 2200 meters, July 1, 1953; Vie. Turkish Border Latakia, Syria, August 2, 1953, lat. 35O 50" long. 36' 01"; Dahr el Ain, Lebanon, October 10, 1951. Cyphoderus (Serroderus) spinatus n. sp.
Plate 6, figures 9-11, Plate 7, figure 8 Body oval, head bluntly oval with well developed mouth-



================================================================================

80 Psyche [September
parts. White without eyes or any indication of pigment. Antennae four-segmented with first and second segments subcylindrical, third segment short and swollen apically, and fourth segment fusiform. Clothing of fourth segment of numerous setae some curved acuminate and ciliate, others smooth blunt and sharply curved. Both varieties decrease in size apically. The remainder of antennal segments are similarly clothed except that ciliate setae become relatively larger and straighter, and the smooth setae are largely limited to the ventral surfaces. The third antennal sense organ of two blunt ovoid stalked knobs and a pair of small slender, sharply angled blunt setae. The body well covered with fine scales. Large ciliate acuminate setae present on the ventral surface of the animal and posterior two segments.
Body with scattered
short to long slender bothriotrichia.
Legs with numerous short acuminate setae. Tenent hair stout and pointed on all legs.
Unguis stout, sharply
acuminate with paired basal prominent teeth, two small
but definite median teeth. Apical-most tooth at about mid-level of unguis.
Manubrium with normal clothing, dens with acuminate ciliate setae, ciliate and smooth scales and spines (see Plate 6, fig. 10). Outer row of dorsal fringed scales six
Figures 1-5 Oncopodura ambigua n. sp. 1. Claw, paratype, approx. 1000 x. 2. Habitus, setae and scales omitted, holotype, approx. 100 x. 3. Left postantennal organ, paratype, approx. 1000 x. 4. Third antennal sense organ, paratype, approx. 2000 x. 5. Dens and mucro, holotype, approx. 2000 x. Figures 6-8 Troglopedetes canis n. sp. 6. Detail 01' clothing of antenna, with different types of setae mentioned in descrip- tion labelled. Small lower diagram shows whole fourth segment with expanded part hatched, detail holotype, approx. 1000 x. 7. Front claw, holotype, approx. 1000 x. 8. End of dens and mucro, paratype, apprcx. 350 x. Figures 9-11 Cyphoderus spinatus n. sp. 9. Clasp organ at base of dens, paratype, approx. 1000 x. 10. Mucro and dens, holotype, approx. 400 x. 11. Hind foot, paratype, approx. 400 x. Figure 12. Cyphoderus assinzilis Bonier. Mucro and dens of specimen from Syria. approx. 400 x.




================================================================================




================================================================================

82 Psyche [September
in number, distalmost strikingly larger than remainder. Inner row with two scales and in addition two short stout spines which appear to take the positions normally oc- cupied by scales. If we consider the two pairs of spines as equivalent to scales, the group ends up as part of Delaware's "multidentati group" to which it shows a number of similarities. Taken from one locality; Jisr esh Chouer, Syria, September 21, 1953. In swamp, Berlese funnel sample, wet soil mixed with dead reeds and roots. Mucronal formula (after Delamare) aAlA5. Only four specimens were seen and in this series little variation was noted. In one specimen the unpaired teeth were reduced to one extremely minute tooth on the first two pairs of legs. The external row of fringed scales were five in number on two specimens.
The presence of spines along with the fringed setae on the dens serves to separate this species readily from all previously described species of the genus. The presence of only two fringed scales on the internal row in this species would appear to place the species in Delamare's Serroderus. As is pointed out elsewhere the limits of this taxon need re-definition.
Fig. 1. Cyphoderus assirnilis Borner. Claw, specimen from Syria, approx. 500 x. Fig. 2. C. genneserae Carpenter. Clasp organ at base of dens, specimen from Lebanon, approx. 1200 x. Fig. 3. C. (Cyphoda) grass& Cassagnau and Delamare. Mucro and tip of dens typical Le- banese specimen, approx. 600 x. Fig. 4. C. (Cyphoda) grassei Cas- sagnau and Delamare. Basal dental organ, approx. 1200 x. Fig. 5. C. assirnilis Borner. Basal dental organ, specimen from Syria, approx. 1200 x. Fig. 6. C. (Cyphoda) grassei Cassagnau and Delamare. Semi- diagrammatic representation of dorsal chaetotaxy. Fig. 7. C. genneserae Carpenter. As above, specimen from Lebanon. Fig. 8. C. spinatus n. sp. As above, paratype.




================================================================================




================================================================================

Psyche [September
Cyphoderus assirnilis Borner
Plate 6, figure 12, Plate 7, figures 1, 5 Cyphoderus assimilis Borner, 1906, Mitt. Naturhist. Mus. Hamburg 23 : 181. The true identity of this species is a difficult problem to solve. The species C. assimilis, C. siqnilis, C. subsirnilis, and C. simulans all have in common: bidenticulate mucro, unguis without tunica and with two unpaired teeth, only a single well developed basal ungual tooth and a clavate tenent hair. Although the absence of the tunica, the un- paired median tooth, and clavate tenent appear to show some variation and much difference of interpretation, we have little choice other than to accept these as real charac- teristics. It would appear from Borner7s description that his original diagnosis is a composite of two species. One of these is the species later described by Folsorn as C. si~nilis. The evidence for this is as follows: First Borner, 1906, described the species from two collections ; one from Egypt, and one from orchids from the West Indies. Since the form Folsom described was from the West Indies, it seems quite probable that it is equivalent to the latter form seen by Borner. If this is accepted then a number of facts indicate that the ldescription is composite, and the Egyptian form is another species. Borner says that the inner terminal scale is shorter to somewhat longer than the mucro. In the West Indian and Central American specimens it is never as long as the mucro. He says there is usually a small lamella upon the mucro; the West Indian and Central American material always have some lamella. This would mean that to account for his descrip- tion the species seen by Borner were two: one an Egyptian form sharing the common characteristics of the group with a dental scale longer than rnucro and without lamella on the mucro, and a second form later described by Folsom as C. sirnilis. C. subsimzlis of Delamare satisfies both requirements for the Egyptian species, but the figure of the unguis differs strikingly from that given by Borner in 1913. I have collections from Syria which satisfy all of the characteristics listed above. The one major dis- agreement between the species is the relative size of the



================================================================================

19571 Christiansen - Collembola of Lebanon 85 mucrones. Since this, as most ratio distinctions, is very unstable it is not a serious objection.
If this is accepted
as the true assimilis then the following table can be used to separate the four species:
dental
formula 5/6 5/6 4/6 6/6
internal
setae of 1 row
tibiotarsus "smooth" "smooth" ? ?
mucro no lamella with lamella no lamella no lamella distal scale
/ mucro longer shorter longer shorter
Distribution: Bahr Atibe, east of Damascus, Syria, July 10, 1953.
Cyphodems albinus (Nicolet)
Cyphoderus albinos (Nicolet), 1842, Nouv. Mem. Soc. Helv. Sci. Nat. 6 : 1-88.
Cassagnau and Delamare reported this from Dahr el Ain in Lebanon. I have two specimens taken from Latakia Syria, which appear to be this species. Unfortunately both were damaged in capture so that a certain identifica- tion is impossible.
Cyphodems bidenticulatus (Parona)
Cyphoderus bidenticulatus (Parona), 1888, Ann. Mus. Civico Geneva Ser. 6:83.
Reported from two caves in Lebanon by Cassagnau and Delamare.
Cyphoderus agnotus Borner
Cyphode'rus agnotus Borner 1906, op. cit. : 180-181. Although this form has not been recorded from Lebanon or Syria its widespread occurrence throughout Palestine makes it quite probable that it does occur in the southern part of this area.




================================================================================

Psyche
[September
Genus Troglopedet es
Cassagnau and Delamare recorded two new species of this cavernicolous genus from Lebanon (op. cit.). This known species of the genus is largely cireum-Mediter- ranean in distribution ; but, the existence of Paleotropical and Neotropical members indicates the possibility of a tropicopolitan but still undiscovered distribution. One new species was discovered in this work bringing the known Syrian-Lebanese forms to three.
Troglopedetes orientalis Cassagnau & Delamare Troglopedetes orientalis, Cassagnau & Delamare, 1951, op. cit. : 385-387. These authors recorded this species from three localities in Lebanon. One record was non-cavernicolous. Troglopedetes vandeli Cassagnau & Delarnare Troglopetes vandeli, Cassagnau & Delamare, 1951, op. cit.: 387-388. Taken from one cave in Lebanon.
Trogopedetes canis n. sp.
Plate 6, figures 6-8
Facies characteristic for the genus. Antennae with basal three segments subcylindrical and fourth segment divided in middle and elongate fusiform in shape. Antennae covered with a variety of setae of different types (see Plate 6, figure 6). Setae of Type A decreasing in size apically and with the ciliations becoming more prominent. Setae of types F and B are limited to the fourth antenna1 segment while those of type C are most numerous here and upon a limited region on the inner margin of the apex of the second segment. Fourth segment with two scale-like knobs having a lateral axis, and a pair of small and oval blades projecting out from this. In addition nine smooth setae are present. Scales oval, with extremely short fine striations. Dorsum of first thoracic segment with an anterior lateral fringe of large acuminate finely ciliate setae. Because of the dense covering of large scales, the remainder of the body setae are difficult to perceive, but the situation appears to be quite similar to that found in Cyphoderus. Dense with a single row of twenty-one spines. Mucro with four very small and two large dorsal teeth.




================================================================================

19571 Christknsen - CoZZembola of Lebanon 87 Tibiotarsi with all setae uniformly ciliate. Tenent hair prominent and clavate. Unguis with basal teeth well de- veloped, one definitely larger, two unpaired median teeth, the apical one being very minute. Median teeth more prominent upon the hind unguis. Unguiculus acuminate and sparsely serrate along its posterior margin. Variation in dental spines: 22/19, 21/23, 22/21, 19/20, 19/23.
Known only from the type locality: Dog River Cave, Lebanon, July, 1951 on Debris 1 km. inside cave. DISCUSSION
This species is similar in many respects to T. orientalis but differs from this species in the shape of the mucro, the number and disposition of the dental spines, possession of a clavate tenent hair, the type of setae upon the anten- nae (see below), and the structures of the ungues. In this last characteristic the present species ressembles T. machadoi Delamare, but it differs from this form in most respects, most strikingly in the relative length of the mucro.
The setae upon the antennae of these animals furnish an excellent series of characteristics. Unfortunately only three species were available for comparison but as the following table will illustrate, these indicated the value of further investigations of this characteristic. In addition to this the so-called sense organ of the third antenna1 segment differs among the three forms (axis central in ruffoi and lateral in the other two). seta type orientalis ruffoi
A * longer, ciliation more
prominent
B stalk longer than apical longer only slightly expansion expanded apically
C unilaterally finely ciliate dense mass upon apex of third segment
D * straight
E *
*
F longer and definitely longer
curved
* signifies similar to that illustrated for canis



================================================================================

Psyche
[September
Oncopodura ambigua n. sp.
Plate 6, figures 1-5
Facies typical for genus. White, without trace of pig- ment or eyes. All antennal segments subovoid. Antennal segment four equipped with an apical conical projection and four blunt oval "sensory" setae. Remainder of setae of fourth segment slender smooth and acuminate. Third antennal segment with apical organ of two elliptical rods, with marked ladder-like striations, without clearly visible central axis. Remainder of antennae covered with a mix- ture of smooth setae (as in fourth antennal segment) and heavy conical finely striate setae. Postantennal organ of six lobes, the anterior pair lying at right angles to the long axis of the head, and the remainder radiating back- ward from this.
Tibiotarsus without any clearly spatulate setae. Unguis untoothed, with a definite "triangular lamella" and an opposing smaller but similar seta. Both structures are attached near the base of the unguis. Empodial appendage simple, external edge straight and equipped with a short apical filament.
Mucro slightly shorter than dens, equipped with an apical and three dorsal teeth. A single large scale is at- tached to the base of the mucro. Dens clearly subdivided into two portions. Inner dorsal margin of dens equipped with four apically curved heavy ciliate setae. A sixth seta is on the outer margin near the base of the dens. Remainder of dorsal surface with one large scale and five acuminate smooth setae.
DISCUSSION
In the series examined there was little variation out- side of relative size. The large ciliate setae upon the inner margin may be five in number. Occasionally the basal- most of these setae is not curved at its apex. The P.A.O. is often sunken into the head and it is very difficult to puzzle out the exact arrangement of the lobes. The presence of a definite triangular ungual lamella com- bined with the presence of a six-lobed P.A.O. immediately serves to distinguish this species from all those given in



================================================================================

19571 Christiansen - CoZZem&oIa of Lebanon 89 Bonet (1943). In most characteristics this species would appear to be most closely allied to 0. crassicornis Shoe- botham and 0. cruciata Bonet, but it may readily be distinguished from both of these by the presence of the ungual lamella.
This animal was extracted from a soil sample with a Berlese Funnel. Since only one locality is known, the range of the animal cannot be determined. Known only from the type locality:
Campus American
University, Beirut, Lebanon, various dates, 1953. LITERATURE CITED (See also Bibliography to Part I) BONET, M. F.
1943, Sobre La Classification de 10s Oncopoduridae Anales de la Escuela Nac. Cien. Biol. 3 (1-2) :127-153. CHRISTIANSEN, K.
1956. The Collembola of Lebanon and Western Syria. Part I. General Considerations and the Family Onychiuridae. Psyche 63 (4): 119-133.
DELAMARE-DEBOUTTEVILLE, CL.
1948. Collemboles Termitophiles et Myrmecophiles. Arch. Zool. Ex- perimentale Gen. 85 :261-425.




================================================================================


Volume 64 table of contents