Cambridge Entomological Club, 1874
PSYCHE

A Journal of Entomology

founded in 1874 by the Cambridge Entomological Club
Quick search

Print ISSN 0033-2615
This is the CEC archive of Psyche through 2000. Psyche is now published by Hindawi Publishing.

John M. Burns.
Cryptic Sleeping Posture of a Skipper Butterfly, Erynnis brizo.
Psyche 76(4):382-386, 1969.

This article at Hindawi Publishing: https://doi.org/10.1155/1969/97825
CEC's scan of this article: http://psyche.entclub.org/pdf/76/76-382.pdf, 980K
This landing page: http://psyche.entclub.org/76/76-382.html


The following unprocessed text is extracted automatically from the PDF file, and is likely to be both incomplete and full of errors. Please consult the PDF file for the complete article.

CRYPTIC SLEEPING POSTURE OF
A SKIPPER BUTTERFLY, ERYNNIS BRIZO*
BY JOHN M. BURNS
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University Hesperiids have seldom been observed asleep in nature. A major exception to this general statement is provided by the hesperiine Thymelicus lineola (Ochsenheimer), an early twentieth century accidental import from Eurasia now thriving in much of its expand- ing North American range (Arthur 1966; Burns 1966). The ex- traordinarily high density attained by colonizing populations of T. lineola has drawn attention even to dormant individuals. Hensel ( 1966) found numerous examples clinging to vegetation in early evening at Edmundston, New Brunswick, and easily sampled them by hand. I similarly sampled T. Hneola on the evening of 24 June 1968 in a pasture at Durham, Middlesex County, Connecticut,
where it abounded, although it had begun to appear in that region only five years before (Apter and Burns 1965). The sleeping skippers sat exposed on leaves, stems, and flowers of forbs and grasses, with the upper sides of the wings together above the back- a position commonly assumed by these skippers when momentarily at rest in the course of diurnal activity. There was no suggestion of concealing behavior.
-
In contrast to this are two observations on a native pyrgine, Erynnis brizo (Boisduval and Leconte), made when I was collecting genitalic differentiates of this species, and natural hybrids between them, in Texas (Burns and Gillmor, in preparation), E, brizo characteristically rests between diurnal flights with both pairs oi wines stretched out horizontally.
-
In pine and scrubby oak habitat along park road PI between Bastrop and Buescher state parks, Bastrop County, Texas, on 14 March 1967, at 1730 hours C.S.T., a flying E. brizo bnzo male that I was pursuing abruptly flew to a dead branch on the prostrate skeleton of a shrub. The gray, barkless branch was about the diam- eter of a. lead pencil, about half a meter above the ground, and parallel to it.
The skipper lit on the ventral side of this branch and instantly embraced it by aligning its body with the branch and "Published with the aid of a grant from the Museum of Comparative
Zoology at Harvard College.
Manuscript received by the editor September 9, 1969



================================================================================

19691 Burns - Skipper Butterfly 383
folding its wings rooflike over its abdomen in the manner of many moths. The primaries fully covered the secondaries, and the apices of the primaries extended to the dorsolateral surfaces of the branch. In E. brizo the upper sides of the brown primaries are partly over- scaled with gray - especially distad. As a result, the skipper blended with the branch and literally looked like "a bump on a log." The speed with which the skipper took up its sleeping position is reminiscent of a rapidly flying female of Hesperia uncas macswaini MacNeil1 seen at 3170 meters in the White Mountains, Mono County, California, by MacNeill (1964: 38) : "With no apparent hesitation it turned and disappeared into the eastern side of a dense bemisia bush. Immediate investigation revealed the insect sitting with closed wings four inches within the tangle of terminal twigs and leaves. At first gentle, then vigorous disturbance of that portion of the shrub evoked no visible response upon the part of the insect. The specimen was captured by vigorously tapping the main branch, causing it to fall into an open container.'' Unlike this Hesperia female, however, the E. b. brizo male did not become torpid at once (the late afternoon was warm and rather sunny, with thin high cloud) ; it energetically flew off when I tried to bottle it a minute or SO after it had lit. I
followed for several minutes and about two hundred meters before losing it. In this interval the skipper seemed at times to investigate briefly other low dead branches. In juniper and scrub oak habitat on the north rim of Palo Duro Canyon, 24 kilometers south of Claude, Armstrong County, Texas, on 12 April 1968, at 1625 hours C.S.T., a flying female of E. bnzo burgessi (Skinner) that I was pursuing suddenly settled on a gray branch of a small Quercus vzohnana shrub that was barely beginning to leaf out. The branch was about a third of a meter above the ground and nearly parallel to it. The skipper lit on the dorsal side of the branch and at once assumed a mothlike posture as described above, except that the primaries scarcely embraced the branch. The afternoon was warm but cloudy at this time; and though the sun shone brightly again later and though some individuals in the pop- ulation kept active, this female remained quiet. When she was photographed after almost an hour, her only move had been a ninety- degree rotation from the top to the side of the branch (fig. I). She
was torpid and was bottled as soon as photographs were taken. These two strikingly similar observations - made one year and 665 kilometers apart on both sexes and two of the three major dif- ferentiates of polytypic species E. brizo (treated in detail by Burns



================================================================================

Psyche
[December
Fig. I, Female of Erynni's tirim htirafk asleep on a branch of Qrtfrrus mohnana in Pato D-aro Canyon, Texas, at 1720 hours C.S.T. on 12 Aprii 1968.
Her head is on the right. For further orientation compare fig. 2. A. Dorsal view of female.
B. Right iateral view of female,
1964: 43-66, 195-205) -are enough to suggest strongly that this behavior is general for the entire transcontinental assemblage of populations. Wherever they occur in North America, these gray/ brown skippers are primarily in scrub oak habitat and so never lack a sleeping substrate of small, low, woody (often gray) branches.



================================================================================

19691 Burns - Skipper Buftrrfiy 385
Pig. 2. The sleeping female of fig. 1 pinned and spread at a later &me. Dorsal view. Her wingspread is about 38 mm. The sleeping position of E, brim, unlike that of various butter- flies, affords little to no protection from weather; the skipper is exposed, but it is concealed visually from many potential predators. The cryptic posture is assumed so abruptly that a fast-moving skipper almost vanishes into a more or less static landscape. A different but related cryptic orientation has been observed in England in E. luges (Linnaeus), a species that was grouped with E. brizo in subgenus Erynnis by Burns (1964: 22-28). Sleeping individuals of E. tages characteristically rest appressed to flower- heads of forbs, grasses, and rushes. As in E. brwo, the wings are roofed noctuid-style over the abdomen and distally tend to be wrapped around the sleeping substrate. The flower-heads chosen are gen- erally dead and brown and hence closely similar in color to the skippers themselves (Trimen 1857 ; Frohawk 1884, I 899, [1924] : 159-161; Tutt 1gos-1906: 288-289; Ford 1945: pl. XIV, fig. 4). I thank Douglas A. Graham for his prescience in bringing a flash- equipped Brownie camera to Texas and for using it to take the photographs that appear in fig. I. Barry I. Kiefer kindly printed these photographs and Spencer J. Berry mounted them. This re- search was supported by National Science Foundation grant GB 5935.



================================================================================

386 Psyche
[December
LITERATURE CITED
AFTER, R. L. AND J. M. BURNS
1965. First Connecticut records of Thymelicus lineola, an introduced hesperiid. J. Lepidopterists' SOC. 19 : 195-196. ARTHUR, A. P.
1966. The present status of the introduced skipper, Thymelicus lineola (Ochs.) (Lepidoptera : Hesperiidae), in North America and possible methods of control. Canadian Entomol. 98: 622-626. BURNS, J. M.
1964. Evolution in skippel butterflies of the genus Erynnis. Univ. California Publ. Entomol. 37: 216 pp., 1 pi. 1966. Expanding distribution and evolutionary potential of Thymelicus lineola (Lepidoptera : Hesperiidae), an introduced skipper, with special reference to its appearance in British Columbia. Canadian
Entomol. 98 : 859-866.
FORD, E. B.
1945. Butterflies. London: Collins. 368 pp., 72 pis. FROHAWK, F. W.
1884. Sleeping position of Thanaos tages. Entomologist 17: 49. 1899. Resting position of Hesperia tagcs. Entomologist 32: 186-187. [1924]. Natural history of British butterflies. Vol. 2. London: Hutchin- son and Co. 206 pp., 29 pis.
HENSEL, H.
1966. A colonv of the European skipper Thymelicus linrola (Hes- periidae) at Edmundston, New Brunswick. J. Lepidopterists' Soc. 20: 28.
MACNEILL, C. D.
1964. The skippers of the genus Hr~prria in western North America with special reference to California (Lepidoptera : Hesperiidae). Univ. California Publ. Entomol. 35: 230 pp., 8 pis. TRIMEN, R.
1857. Position of the skippers in repose. Entomologist's Weekly In- telligencer. 2 : 101.
TUTT, J. W.
1905-1906.
A natural history of the British butterflies. Vol. 1. London: Elliot Stock. 479 pp., 20 pis.




================================================================================


Volume 76 table of contents