Cambridge Entomological Club, 1874
PSYCHE

A Journal of Entomology

founded in 1874 by the Cambridge Entomological Club
Quick search

Print ISSN 0033-2615
This is the CEC archive of Psyche through 2000. Psyche is now published by Hindawi Publishing.

E. S. Waldorf.
Variations in Cleaning Between the Sexes of Sinella coeca (Collembola: Entomobryidae).
Psyche 81(2):254-257, 1974.

This article at Hindawi Publishing: https://doi.org/10.1155/1974/75723
CEC's scan of this article: http://psyche.entclub.org/pdf/81/81-254.pdf, 276K
This landing page: http://psyche.entclub.org/81/81-254.html


The following unprocessed text is extracted automatically from the PDF file, and is likely to be both incomplete and full of errors. Please consult the PDF file for the complete article.

VARIATIONS IN CLEANING BETWEEN THE SEXES OF SJNELLA COECA (COLLEMBOLA: ENTOMOBRYIDAE)* BY ELIZABETH S. WALDORF
Department of Zoology
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803
With the widespread and frequent occurrence of pheromones among insects, it is easy to appreciate the significance of cleaning and grooming behaviors.
However these behaviors are as yet poorly known. Among springtails two papers by Simon (1961, 1963) present the most thorough reports.
These describe the types of cleaning in
representatives of several families, noting the widespread, though infrequent, use of cleaning droplets released from the mouth. My work examines Sinella coeca (Schott) (Family Entomobryidae) for behavioral differences between the sexes. In particular, I have determined the frequency of cleaning and the duration of bouts of cleaning behavior. The initial expectation is that the sexes will spend about equal time cleaning. However, since males are more active, moving about most of the time, their bouts of cleaning are probably shorter. To compensate, I expected males to have more frequent cleaning sessions. An experiment was carried out to test these expectations.
Sinella coeca was reared in mass culture as described previously for Sinella curvisefa (Waldorf, 1971 ) . Cultures were maintained at room temperature (23' iå¡C and supplied commercial yeast as food. Males and females were isolated in individual glass vials with plastic caps. The vials, measuring 18.1 mm in inner diameter, contained a moist plaster of paris-charcoal substrate (to maintain high humidity) and food. After 24-26 hours of isolation, each animal was observed for five minutes, and the number of bouts of cleaning and the total time (out of 5 minutes) engaged in cleaning recorded. This procedure was followed for 50 males and 50 females. To prevent bias the vials were mixed so that during the observation periods the sex of test animals was usually unknown. 'Manuscript received by the editor May 20, 1974.



================================================================================

Table 1. Characteristics of male and female bouts of cleaning behavior. Number of
bouts/animal
Length of
bouts (in sec)
Males
Females
The data in Table I present the overall characteristics of males and females. Comparison of the lengths of bouts using a t-test shows that these are not significantly different (t = 1.049). However the number of bouts is significantly larger in males than in females (t =
1.949; .05 >P>.oI ). Rather than the expected differences, it appears that male sessions of cleaning are of equal length and more frequent than those of females.
At times of observations some individuals were pharate, some vials contained exuviae and others eggs. These allowed the animals to be subdivided into groups corresponding approximately to position in instar. Among the males only two ecdysed within the 24 hour isola- tion period, a sample too small to be meaningful. However among the females, the categories were sufficiently large to permit evaluation. Table 2 gives the data for females of different types. Of the four pharate females, none exhibited any cleaning behavior. Com- parison of recently ecdysed females and females with eggs to remain- ing females revealed no significant differences in bout length. In contrast, comparisons of cleaning frequency among these females showed that females with eggs clean significantly more often (t = 2.488; 25df; P .OI) than other females. As Simon
(1961) has noted, the antennae, the location of im- portant sensory receptors, are cleaned most of ten. There is possibly a positive correlation between frequency of cleaning and the required sensitivity of receptors. In pharate females the old receptors have presumably lost their nervous connections, so that there is no adaptive advantage in cleaning them. In contrast, females that have recently deposited eggs are sensitive to the required stalked spermatophores on the substrate. If this species has alternate reproductive a,nd non-



================================================================================

Psyche
Table 2. Characteristics of cleaning bouts by females of various types. Number of
bouts/animal
Length of
bouts (in sec)
-, .-
x n SD x n SD
Pharate females 0 4 0 - -
Recently eodysed
females 1.63 19 1.34 22.4 3 1 29.0
Females with eggs 2.1 9 1.05 20.8 19 28.9 Other females 1.05 18 1.00 29.1 19 31.7
reproductive instars with oviposition confined to early in the repro- ductive instar as Sinella curviseta (Waldorf, I 97 I ), newly ecdysed females are possibly a mixture of two types: sensitive ones early in the reproductive interval and indifferent, or less sensitive ones, early in the nonreproductive instar. Although the distribution of numbers of cleaning bouts per female is not bimodal, the mean of this category is 1.63, approximately the average (1.57) of the sensitive group with eggs and the remaining females. Note also that the variance of the number of bouts of recently ecdysed females is 1.796 and that of females with eggs and remaining females are 1.102 and 498 respectively.
'Considering males, Mayer ( 1957) has reported that males of Sminthurides aquaticus Bourlet clean more frequently when clasping the antennae of females than when alone. This is consistent with the hypothesis that these males are highly sensitive to olfactory stimuli.
The data indicate that males engage in more total cleaning than females. My recent studies of Sinella cumiseta ( Waldorf, in manu- script) demonstrate that females of this species produce a sex pheromone. This stimulates spermatophore deposition by males in the reproductive instar. Of the males in the present study 48 of 50 were in the reproductive instar at observation time. By frequent cleaning, these maintain their sensitivity to olfactory stimuli including possible pheromones.
MAYER, H.
1957. Zur Biologic und Ethologie einheimischer Collembolen. 2001. Jahrb. abt. Syst. Okol. Geogr. Tiere 85: 501-570,



================================================================================

19741
Waldor f -- sinella coeca
SIMON, H. R.
Beobachtungen zum Verhalten arthropleoner Collembolen (Aptery- gota). Deutsch Entomolog. Z., N. F. 8: 216-221. Zum Putzverhalten arthropleoner Collembolen (Ins., Apterygota) . Entomolog. Z., 73 : 221-228.
E. s.
The reproductive biology of Sinella cumiseta (Collembola : Entomobryidae) in laboratory culture. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol 8: 451-463.
CENTENNIAL OF ENTOMOLOGY. Cornell University has announced a Centennial of Entomology, celebrating John Henry Comstock's graduation and the founding of studies in entomology at the Uni- versity. A symposium on Insects, Science and Society will be held on October 14 and 15, 1974. The speakers at the symposium will be as follows :
Howard E. Evans, Colorado State University: The Comstock Heritage.
John J. McKelvey, Jr., The Rockefeller Foundation: Insects and Human Welfare.
Edward 0. Wilson, Harvard University: Insect and Human Societies.
John S. Kennedy, Imperial College Field Station, Ascot, England: Insect Dispersal.
Richard D. Alexander, University of Michigan : Insect Oommuni- cation - Acoustical.
Wendell L. Roelofs, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva : Insect Communication - Chemical. Mano D. Pathak, International Rice Research Institute, Philip- pines: Patterns of Interaction between Plants and Insects. T. R. E. Southwood, Imperial College Field Station, Ascot, Eng- land : The Dynamics of Insect Populations. Powers Messenger, University of California, Berkeley: Parasitoids, Predators and Population Dynamics.
Waldemar Klassen, U.S.D.A., ARS-Plant Industry Station, Maryland: Pest Management - Organization and Resources. L. Dale Newsom, Louisiana State University: Pest Management - Concept to Practice.
Further information can be obtained from the Chairman, Depart- ment of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850.



================================================================================


Volume 81 table of contents