Bert Hölldobler and Hiltrud Engel.
Tergal and Sternal Glands in Ants.
Psyche 85(4):285-330, 1978.

This article at Hindawi Publishing: https://doi.org/10.1155/1978/23867
CEC's scan of this article: http://psyche.entclub.org/pdf/85/85-285.pdf, 19392K
This landing page: http://psyche.entclub.org/85/85-285.html

The following unprocessed text is extracted automatically from the PDF file, and is likely to be both incomplete and full of errors. Please consult the PDF file for the complete article.

PSYCHE
Vol. 85 December, 1978 No. 4
TERGAL AND STERNAL GLANDS IN ANTS*
BY BERT HOLLDOBLER AND HILTRUD ENGEL
Department of Biology
MCZ Laboratories, Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Chemical signals, or pheromones as they are generally called, play a central role in the complex communication system of ant societies. During the last 20 years a number of exocrine glands have been identified as the anatomical sources for a diversity of pheromones which mediate sexual and social behavior in ants (for reviews see Wilson 1971, Blum 1977, Holldobler 1978). In recent years, however, several hitherto unknown exocrine glandular structures have been discovered in ants and the behavioral functions of some of them have already been determined. In this paper we will review these findings and will report the new results of our comparative morphological study of tergal and sternal glands in ants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
For histological investigations live specimens were fixed in alco- holic Bouin (Dubosqu Brasil) or Carnoy (Romeis 1948), embedded in methyl methacrylate, and sectioned 8p. thick with a Jung Tetrander I microtome (Rathmayer 1962). The staining was Azan (Heidenhain). The SEM pictures were taken with an AMR 1000 A Scanning Electron Microscope. For some of the species which could only be identified to the generic level, the respective number is given of the voucher specimens, which are deposited in the ant collection of the MCZ (Harvard University).
*Manuscript received by the editor A4a.v 3, 1979. 285
Psii-he gS:285-330 11978). http:llpsyche cnlclub ore/SSWS-285 html



================================================================================

286 Psyche
[December
Tergal glands
a. Pygidial gland
In a detailed anatomical study of Myrmica rubra Janet (1898) described a pair of clusters of a few glandular cells, located under the third gastric tergum. Each cell sends a duct through the intersegmental membrane between the third and fourth gastral terga. We discovered a similar, but considerably larger paired glandular complex at the same anatomical position in Novomessor cockerelli and N. albisetosus (Holldobler et a1 1976). Kugler (1978) recently investigated a number of myrmicine ants and in many of them he found the gland, which had "distinct reservoirs, produced by invagination of the intersegmental membrane between abdomi- nal tergum 6 and tergum 7 (pygidium)". Kugler suggested that these glandular organs be called pygidial glands. We accept this terminol- ogy, because it describes the anatomical designation of the organ more precisely than the term "dorsal gland" or "tergal gland", originally suggested (Holldobler et a1 1976, Holldobler and Haskins 1977). However, it has to be pointed out that the pygidium of the ants (the last exposed tergum) is the 7th abdominal tergum and is not homologous to the pygidium of the Coleoptera (8" abdominal tergum). Hence, the pygidial glands of ants are not homologous to the pygidial glands of Coleoptera.
In a previous study (Holldobler and Haskins 1977) we found pygidial glands with large reservoirs in several ponerine and myr- meciine ants (Amblyopone, Paraponera, Ectatomma, Odontoma- chs, Pachycondyla, Platythyrea, Rhytidoponera, Myrmecia) and we demonstrated that the virgin females of Rhytidoponera metallica attract males by the release of a pheromone from these glands. In his anatomical studies of Rhytidoponera metallica and R. convexa, Whelden (1957, 1960) described a pair of cell clusters each com- prising 8-15 glandular cells. Each cell sends a duct through the membrane connecting the 6"' and 7"' abdominal segments. We are now certain that Whelden already had discovered the pygidial gland in Rhytidoponera; his histological methods, however, may not have enabled him to detect the large reservoirs associated with the glandular cell clusters. Similar paired glandular structures were found by Whelden (1957) in the ponerine species Stigmatomma (=Amblyopone) pallipes.




================================================================================

19781 Holldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 287 Finally, independently of our investigations, Maschwitz (pers. communication) found a pygidial gland in Leptogenys chinensis, which he called the "dorsal gland" (Maschwitz and Schonegge, 1977).
The new anatomical investigations presented in this paper reveal that the pygidial glands are much more common in ants than previously assumed. Usually the organ consists of a pair of lateral clusters of glandular cells, each cell sending a duct through the intersegmental membrane between the 6"' and 7"' abdominal terga. Depending on the species, the intersegmental membrane can be invaginated to different degrees, so that it can form a more or less voluminous reservoir (Fig. 1, 2, 3, 4). If no reservoir is present, the glandular structures can easily be missed during the dissection and histological sectionings are therefore required to determine whether or not the pygidial gland is present. As we have already indicated for Novomessor and as confirmed by Kugler (1978) for several other myrmicine species, the pygidial gland can be associated with a special cuticular structure on the pygidium (7th tergum), (Fig. 5, 6, 7). Our histological studies demonstrated, however, that the absence of such structures does not necessarily indicate the absence of Figure 1.
Schematic illustration of glandular cells that send ducts through the intersegmental membrane. When the membrane is increasingly more invaginated, it forms an increasingly larger reservoir (a to c).



================================================================================

288 Psyche [December
pygidial glands. Thus, in several myrmicine species, in which we (Holldobler et a1 1976) and Kugler (1978) previously assumed the pygidial gland to be absent, we find that we now detect this organ by histological methods. Tables la and Ib list the species of the major subfamilies that we investigated histologically and indicate the type of tergal glands found.
b. Postpygidial gland
Dorsal glandular structures which open posteriorly to the py- gidial gland, between the 7 and 8 abdominal terga (spiracular plate), we call postpygidial glands (Fig. 8). Whelden (1957, 1960) described glands in the 5"' gastral segment of Rhytidoponera convexa and R. metallica. For R. convexa he writes: "Even the largest of these is less than half the size of the fourth-segment glands . . . . In the extreme case, there may be but a single gland cell on each side. It is often difficult to distinguish such a unicellular gland from an oenocyte, despite the usually distinct difference in size of the two cell types. Only the identification of a duct certainly distinguishes such a gland from the ductless oenocyte. In many individuals this second pair of glands could not be found". Whelden (1960) makes similar statements for R. metallica. Our results are somewhat different. We found well developed postpygidial glands in the 4 species of Rhytidoponera investigated (Table 1 a). In all specimens we found a pair of clusters of glandular cells. Each cluster contains about 15-20 cells and each cell sends a duct through the interseg- mental membrane close to the spiracular plate (Fig. 9, 10). In some ant species the postpygidial gland consists of only a few glandular cells, in others the postpygidial gland is associated with a well developed reservoir (Table la, 1 b).
Sternal glands
In several species we discovered intersegmental sternal glands (Table 2). They can consist of a few glandular cells that send their channels through the intersegmental membrane, or of large clusters of glandular cells associated with voluminous reservoirs. These reservoirs are formed by invaginations of the intersegmental mem- branes (Fig. 8).
In several Leptogenys species (Fig. 12) we found two large sternal glands with reservoirs between the 7' and 6 , and 6' and 5' sterna. The latter glandular organ is usually associated with a special cuticular structure on the 6th sternum (Fig. 12). In Paltothyreus



================================================================================

19781 Holldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 289 tarsatus we found well developed sternal glands between the 7 and tith, 6th and 5th, and 5th and 4th sterna, but no reservoirs. Instead, the duct openings are associated with filament-like protrusions of the intersegmental membrane (Fig. 13, 14).
Other abdominal glands
The glandular venom apparatus of ants is composed of the Dufour's gland (alkine or accessory gland) and the poison gland. Although the venom apparatus of ants is very well studied (see reviews by Maschwitz and Kloft 197 1, Blum and Hermann 1978 a, b), other glands, such as Koschevnikov's gland (sting gland), Bordas's gland and sting sheath glands, known from other Hymen- optera, have not been firmly established in ants. Koschevnikov (1 899) found in honeybees and Vespa paired clusters of glandular cells located laterally near the intersegmental membrane between the quadrate plate and the spiracular plate. Each individual cell sends channels into gathering ducts, which connect with the intersegmental membrane. Altenkirch (1962) found similar glands in most Apidae that she had studied. There are indications that this gland might also be present in some species of the primitive ant subfamilies Myrmeciinae and Ponerinae. Whelden (1957) described a pair of clusters of gland cells, located slightly dorsally on each side of the sting of Stigma- tomma (=Amblyopone) pallipes. Each cell sends a "rather tortuous duct . . . down and inward, to open through a membrane which is above the sting". Robertson (1968) found "sting glands" in Rhy- tidoponera "toward the region of the triangular plate, where they are attached to the intersegmental membrane". She described similar glands in Bothroponera sp. (=Pachycondyla), Leptogenys sjoste& and Myrmecia gulosa. In the latter species the glands are described as "two well formed masses of gland cells, each cell attached to the intersegmental membrane in the region of the triangular plate by a long, simple, cuticular duct". Table 3 (A) lists the species in which we found paired glandular structures, closely resembling the "sting glands" described by Robertson. In all cases the glandular cells are located near the triangular plate, and from each cell a rather long duct leads downwards and opens through a membrane near the base of the sting (Fig. 15). Although we could not precisely locate the openings of the ducts, we assume they opened in the sting chamber.



================================================================================

290 Psyche [December
Altenkirch (1962) and Maschwitz (1964) discovered a so-called sting sheath gland in several bee species. It consists of a palisade epithelium located in the sheath valves. In some ant species we found a distinct palisade epithelium in the sheath valves and/or single glandular cells with long individual ducts (Table 3 (B), Fig. 16, 17). Janet (1898) describes similar single gland cells, located near the sheath valves, in Myrmica rubra.
Bordas's glands, as they were described by Bordas (1895) in Terebrantia and reexamined by Rathmayer (1962) in several sphecid wasps, could not be identified in ants, although some of clusters of the single gland cells which send their ducts through the membrane of the sheath valves could be related to the Bordas's glands. It is obvious to us that the glandular structures, associated with the sting apparatus of ants, need to be investigated in greater detail in future studies.
In several ant species (Table 3 (C)) we found a highly developed palisade epithelium in the 7 sternum (Fig. 8). It is especially conspicuous in several Leptogenys species and in the army ants Eciton and Neivamyrmex, but it is not strongly developed in Dorylus. In the dolichoderine species and in Aneuretus this epithe- lium seems to be closely associated with the sternal gland (Pavan's gland).
In the African weaver ant (Oecophvlla longinoda) we discovered a sternal gland under the 7th sternum, which is quite different from the glandular epithelium described above (Holldobler and Wilson 1976, 1978). This structure consists of an array of single glandular cells that send short channels into cuticular cups on the outer surface
of the sternite. In none of the other formicine species investigated, listed in table 1 b, did we find this type of sternal gland. But in Camponotus sericeus we detected different clusters of glandular cells in the last sternum. Each cell sends a long channel through the intersegmental membrane near the vagina into the ventral part of the "sting chamber". We discovered similar paired glandular cell clusters in most myrmicine species we investigated. The gland is especially distinct in Novomessor and Veromessor, where the glandular cell channels penetrate the membrane near the vagina (Fig. 18).
The function of the intersegmental glands: The functions of most of the glandular structures described in this paper are not yet known, but in a few species the function of the



================================================================================

Holldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants
pygidial gland has already been identified. In Novomessor cockerelli and N. albisetosus the strongly smelling secretion of the pygidial glands releases a "panic alarm" response in workers, apparently specifically designed against army ant predation (Holldobler in prep.). Kugler (in press) demonstrated that in Pheidole biconstricta the pygidial glands produce an alarm-defense secretion. A quite different function has been discovered in Rhytidoponera metallica. Here the wingless virgin females attract males by the release of a pheromone from the pygidial gland (Holldobler and Haskins 1977). Since Rhytidoponera workers also have a well-developed pygidial gland and are attracted to its secretions, we believe we have not yet discovered the whole functional spectrum of this organ. In Lepto- genys chinensis, Maschwitz and Schonegge (1977) demonstrated that the pygidial gland secretions serve together with poison gland substances as a recruitment trail pheromone. We obtained similar results when we recently reexamined the anatomical source of the trail pheromone of Pachycondyla (=Termitopone) laevigata. This ant species conducts well organized predatory raids on termites. During raiding the workers move in a single file, one closely behind another, along a powerful trail pheromone laid down by leading scout ants. Blum (1966) has identified the hindgut as the source of this recruitment trail pheromone. We cannot confirm his findings. In our experiments with artificial trails laid with extracts from several abdominal glands, only the pygidial gland secretions re- leased massive trail-following behavior in P. laevigata (Holldobler and Traniello in prep.). A careful observational study of the trail- laying behavior of P. laevigata workers revealed that not the anus but rather the pygidial gland is dragged over the ground. Although the pygidial gland of P. laevigata has no definite reservoir, it is very well developed and is associated with an elaborate cuticular struc- ture on the 7th tergum (Fig. 19, 20). The glandular secretion is apparently stored in the many cavities of this structure. When trailing, the ants rub this structure with its special applicator surface over the ground and deposit thereby the trail pheromone. Traniello (pers. communication) observed species of Odontomachus during nest emigrations performing the same trail laying behavior. We suspect that in Odontomachus also the pygidial gland secrets a trail pheromone (Fig. 21).
In Bothroponera (=Pachycondyla) tesserinoda we previously analyzed the signals involved in the tandem running recruitment technique (Holldobler et a1 1973, Maschwitz et a1 1974). We



================================================================================

292 Psyche [December
discovered that the cues responsible for "binding" the follower behind the leader ant include both a surface pheromone and mechanical stimuli. Although we could extract this surface phero- mone, we were not able to identify its anatomical source; all experiments with secretions from the known exocrine glands had negative results. After the recent discovery of the pygidial gland in Pachycondyla we have begun to conduct tandem running experi- ments with Pachycondyla crassa* and P. harpax*, using dummies contaminated with pygidial gland secretions. Our preliminary re- sults strongly indicate that pygidial gland substance might be the source of the tandem running pheromone in these species. In the doryline army ants raiding and emigrations are conducted along chemical trails deposited by workers. For Neivamyrmex, Watkins (1964) and Watkins et a1 (1967), and for Eciton hamatum, Blum and Portocarrero (1964), identified the hindgut as the source of the trail pheromone. In addition, Chadab and Rettenmeyer (1975) and Topoff and Mirenda (1975) demonstrated that besides the relatively long-lasting hindgut trail-substance, other signals (possibly more volatile secretions) are involved in the organization of "mass recruitment" in Eciton and Neivamyrmex. We believe that our morphological investigations provide new possibilities for the analysis of chemical communication in army ants. Both Neivamyrmex and Eciton have large pygidial glands with distinct reservoirs (Fig. 22, 23). The postpygidial gland is smaller, but still considerably larger than in most of the other investigated speciesf. In both army ant species the 7"' tergum is relatively small. Therefore, thereservoirs of the pygidial gland and postpygidial gland open directly above the anus at the abdominal tip (Fig. 23). In workers (all castes) of Eciton the dorsal membrane near the exits of the reservoir of the pygidial glands is conspicuously modified to a brush-like structure (Fig. 24). These morphological features strongly P. crassa was observed'tandem running by W. L. Brown, Jr. (pen. communica- tion) at the western base of Ubombo Mts., Zululand, and by B. Holldobler in Shimba Hills Reserve (Kenya). P. harpax was observed tandem running by S. Levings (pers. communication) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Whelden (1963) described two glands at the extreme posterior end of the gaster of Eciton burchelli workers. Although the description is not very accurate, from his drawings we can conclude that he found the pygidial gland and postpygidial glands.




================================================================================

19781 Holldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 293 suggest that the tergal glands might be involved in the chemical trail communication of army ants. We have begun to test this hypothesis with Eciton harnatum. The pygidial gland secretion of E. hamatum has a strong, characteristic smell. The secretion is probably skatole (Traniello pers. communication), the substance that gives army ants their typical "fecal odor". Recently Brown et a1 (1978) demonstrated that skatole is an effective growth inhibitor for bacteria and fungi and repels insectivorous snakes (Watkins et a1 1969). Our first, preliminary tests demonstrated that Eciton workers follow artificial trails drawn with crushed pygidial glands. When we simultaneously offered trails drawn with hindgut contents and pygidial gland secretions, the latter were significantly preferred during the first minute. When we used trails drawn with secretions of the poison gland or Dufour's gland as controls, the ants always followed the pygidial gland trails. We have to stress, however, that these experiments must be considered pilot tests. The preliminary results, however, are striking enough to warrant a more detailed investiga- tion in the future. It is interesting to note that the anatomy of the pygidial gland in the African army ant, Dorylus molesta, is quite different from that of Eciton and Neivamyrmex (Fig. 25). In this species the 7th tergum is considerably larger than in species of the latter genera, and the reservoirs of the pygidial glands do not open at the abdominal tip. In Dorylus, however, we found single glandular cells with channels opening directly at the anus, a feature we have not detected in other ant species (Fig. 25, 26). Finally, our morphological study of the pygidial gland of Ve- romessor pergandei has led to results that are suggestive of the function of this organ. In this species the 7th tergum is relatively , small, and as a result the large reservoirs of the pygidial glands open at the tip of the gaster (Fig. 27). Veromessor forages in well- organized columns (Went et a1 1972; Wheeler and Rissing 1975; Bernstein 1975). Several observations suggest that these foraging columns are organized by a trail pheromone, though no trail pheromone gland has yet been identified. Clearly, the large pygidial gland
has to be considered as a possible source for the trail pheromone.
The function of most of the newly discovered sternal glands is unknown. Only in Paltothyreus tarsatus could we demonstrate experimentally that foragers lay a recruitment trail with sternal gland secretions (Holldobler in prep.).




================================================================================

294 Psyche [December
Since we first found the pygidial gland widespread in the sub- families Myrmeciinae and Ponerinae, we speculated that this gland might be a primitive monophylogenetic trait in ants generally (Holldobler and Haskins 1977). The results reported in the present paper fully confirm this assumption. A well-developed pygidial gland was found in the most primitive ant, Nothomyrmecia ma- crops, and in representatives of all major subfamilies except in the Formicinae (Table 1 b). We agree with Kugler (1978) that the "anal glands" cf the Dolichoderinae and Aneuretinae are homologous to the pygidial glands of other ant subfamilies. Considering the variation in the morphology of the pygidial glands, even within a single subfamily, we think that the morphological variation of the "anal glands" of dolichoderine and aneuretine species does not warrant a separate terminology. In fact the term "anal gland" is misleading, because the glands do not exit from the anal opening of the gaster, as is sometimes inferred, but between the 6 and 7th abdominal terga (Fig. 28). This was clearly demonstrated by Pavan and Ronchetti (1955). It is our view and also Kugler's (pers. communication) that the "anal glands" should be called pygidial glands.
Kugler (1978) concluded from his comparative studies of myrmi- cine species that usually those species that have reduced or modified stings also have well-developed pygidial glands. He assumes that the pygidial gland replaces the sting apparatus as a chemical defense device. Our finding that well-developed pygidial glands occur in Pogonomyrmex, a genus with a very effective sting apparatus, and in many stinging ponerine species, does not support Kugler's conclusions.
This paper would not have been possible without the help of many people. We would like to thank all the collectors mentioned in Table 1, including Donald W. Windsor, who helped finding the acacias in the Canal Zone. Special thanks to Robert W. Taylor, who sent us the precious Nothomyrmecia. Barry Bolton, William L. Brown, Jr., William H. Gotwald, Jr. and Roy Snelling identified many species for us. We are grateful to Ed Seling for his superb assistance during the SEM work. Frank M. Carpenter's many suggestions improved the manuscript greatly. This work was sup- ported by NSF grant BNS 77-03884.




================================================================================

19781 Holldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 295 List of species of the poneroid complex (Taylor 1978) that were investigated histo- logically, and the types of tergal glands found. When the histological series was incomplete and we could not make a definite statement, the column is marked with "?". When the cuticular structure on the pygidium was only slightly sculptured, we marked the column with "-(+)".
Subfamily/ Species
MYRMECIINAE
Myrmecia
pilosula
PONERINAE
Amblyopone
australis
Amblyopone
pallipes
Platythyrea
cribinoda
Rhytidoponera
metallica
Rhytidoponera
perthensis
Rhytidoponera
purpurea
Collector
and
Locality
R. J. Bartell
R. W. Taylor
Brindabella
Ranges,
Australia
C. P. Haskins +
Manjimup,
W. Australia
J. Traniello +
Carlisle, Mass.
K. Horton t
R. Silberglied
Shimba Hills,
Kenya
C. P. Haskins +
Blackwell
Range,
Queensland,
Australia
C. P. Haskins +
Boddington,
W. Australia
C. P. Haskins +
Black Mountain,
Kuranja,
Queensland




================================================================================

Psyche
[December
Subfamily / Species
Rhytidoponera
violacea
Paltothyreus
tarsatus
Pachycondyla
crassa
Pachycondyla
laevigata
(= Termitopone)
Plectroctena
strigosa
Leptogenys
neutralis
Lept ogenys
pavesii
Lept ogenys
-
nitidia
Leptogenys
regis
Odontomachus
haematoda
Collector
and
Locality
C. P. Haskins
Kings Park,
W. Australia
B. Holldobler
Shimba Hills,
Kenya
B. Holldobler
Shimba Hills,
Kenya
N. Franks
J. Traniello
BCI, Panama
B. Holldobler
Shimba Hills,
Kenya
C. P. Haskins
Manjimup,
W. Australia
B. Holldobler
Shimba Hills,
Kenya
B. Holldobler
Shimba Hills,
Kenya
B. Holldobler
Shimba Hills,
Kenya
C. P. Haskins
BCI, Panama
TABLE la Continued




================================================================================

19781
Holldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants
Subfamily/ Species
DORYLINAE
Neivamyrmex
nigrescens
Eciton
hamatum
Dorylus
molesta
PSEUDOMYRMECINAE
Pseudomyrmex
ferruginea
Pseudomyrmex
pallidus
Tetraponera
spec. (78 / 26)
MYRMECINAE
Myrmica
americana
Tetramorium
cqespit um
Pogonom~rmex
desert orum
Pogonomyrmex
calfornicus
Collector
and
Locality
B. Holldobler
Arizona
A. Aiello
R. Silberglied
J. Traniello
BC1, Panama
B. Holldobler
Shimba Hills,
Kenya
A. Aiello
R. Silberglied
Canal Zone,
Panama
M. Moglich
Florida
B. Holldobler
Shimba Hills,
Kenya
J. Traniello
Carlisle, Mass.
J. Traniello
Carlisle. Mass.
B. Holldobler
Arizona
B. Holldobler
Arizona
TABLE la Continued




================================================================================

Subfamily1 Species
Pogonomyrmex
badius
Veromessor
pergandei
Novomessor
cockerelli
Novomessor
albisetosus
Aphaenogaster
rudis
Aphaenogas fer
huachucana
Pheidole milit icida
(worker & soldier)
Pheidole
desertorum
Atta sexdens
(several castes)
Collector
and
Locality
Psyche
B. Holldobler
Florida
G. Alpert
Mexico
B. Holldobler
Arizona
B. Holldobler
Arizona
J. Traniello
Concord, Mass.
B. Holldobler
Arizona
B. Holldobler
Arizona
B. Holldobler
Arizona
N. Weber
Timehri, Guyana
[December
TABLE la Concluded




================================================================================

Holldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants
TABLE lb
List of species of the formicoid complex (Taylor 1978) that we investigated histo- logically, and the types of tergal glands found. Subfamily/ Species
NOTHOMYRMECIINAE
Nothomyrmecia
macrops
ANEURETINAE
Aneureti
simoni
DOLICHODERINAE
Liometopum
apiculatum
Conomyrma
bicolor
Iridomyrmex
pruinosus
FORMICINAE
Oecopylla
longinoda
Pachycondyla spec.
Myrmecocystus
mexicanus
Formica perpilosa
Camponotus
sericeus
Collector
and
Locality
R. W. Taylor
Eyre Peninsula
S. Australia
E. 0. Wilson
Ratnapura,
Sri Lanka
B. Holldobler
Arizona
B. Holldobler
Arizona
B. Holldobler
Arizona
B. Holldobler
Shimba Hills,
Kenya
R. Silberglied
Nairobi
Arboretum,
Kenya
B. Holldobler
Arizona
,,
M. Moglich
Sri Lanka




================================================================================

Psyche
[December
List of species of the poneroid complex in which we found intersegmental sternal glands.
Species
Location of glands between abdominal segments 7 and 6
6 and 5
5 and 4
reservoir reservoir reservoir
Yes no yes no yes no
Myrmecia pilosula
Rhytidoponera purpurea
Pa/lothyr>.us tarsatus
Pachjconfla crassa
Lepfogen~s neuiralis
Leptogenys pavesii
Leptogenys niiida
Leptogenys regis
Teiraponera sp. (781 26)




================================================================================

List of species, where sting glands (A), sting sheath glands (B), and a glandular epithelium in the 7th sternum (C) were found. In species marked with "(?)" the histological series was not complete and we could therefore not trace the whole glandular structure. Species which have only a glandular epithelium in the sting sheath are marked with (+); those with glandular epithelium and single gland cells with ducts are marked with (++); in unmarked species only single glandular cells with ducts were found.
Myrmecia pilosula
Amblvopone australis
Ambkopone pallipes
Rhytidoponera metallica
Rhytidoponera perihensis
Rhytidoponera purpurea
Rhytidoponera violacea
Plai*rea cribinoda
Paltoth~reus tarsatus
Leptogenw regis
Noihorn~rmecia macrops
(?) Mvrmecia pilosula
Amblvopone australis
Amblyopone pallipes
Rhfldoponera purpurea
Platythyrea cribinoda
Paltothvreus tarsatus
Leptogen~s niiida
(?) Leptogenys regis
(?) Odontomachus haematoda
M~rmica americana
(++) Leptogenys neu t ralis
Leptogen~s pavesii
Lept ogenys nitida
Leprogenjss regis
(+) Eciion hamaium
(++) Neivam vrmex nigrescens
(++) Aneuretus simoni
(++) Iridomyrmex pruinosus
Conomma hicolor
Liometopum apiculatum
(++) Novomessor cockerelli
Novomessor albisetosus




================================================================================

302 Psyche [December
Figure 2. Above: Sagital section through pygidial glands of Amblyc~pon~ austraiis. The gland has no distinct reservoir, but 10-1 5 glandular cells (GC) with channels in each cluster. Below: Pygidial gland of Ambfyoponepallipes with distinct reservoir (R) and 30-40 glandular cells in each cluster.



================================================================================

19781 Hulldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 303 --
Figure 3.
Above: Sagital section through pygidial gland*! of ,%'uiiwmvrnwtia macropx Very large reservoir (R); each cluster consisti; of 50-80 cells; GC = glandular cells; CH = channels of glandular ccils. Below. Pygidial gland of Myrmicu amerirma: No distinct reservoir, 10-15 cells in each cluster.



================================================================================

304 Psyche [December
Figure 4.
Above: Sagital section through pygidial glands of Fogoiwmyrmex californirus: No definite reservoir. but large cell clusters, each containing 30-35 glandular cells (GC). Below: Pygidial gland of Pseudomyrmex ferruginea: No distinct reservoir; intersegmental membrane forms a chitinous duct (D) into which the individual glandular channels open.




================================================================================

19781 Holldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 305 Figure 5.
Above: Sagital section through the pygidial gland of Leptogenys pavesii (GC = glandular cells; CH = channels of GC, CS = cuticuiar structure on the Th tergurn). Below: Close-up view of sagital section through cuticular structure of 7"1



================================================================================

306 Psyche [December
Figure 6. Above: Sagitat section through pygidial gland of Leptogew reis. Below: SEM photograph of cuticular structure of 7"' tergum of L re& The tergurn is cut so that the well-structured cavities under the surface can be seen. (Lettering as in Fig. 5).




================================================================================

19781 HoIidobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 307 Figure 7.
SEM photograph of cuticuiar structure of 7'" tergum of Plecfrocterw strigom. Above: View of the anterior part of the tergum. The cuticular grooves are clearly visible. Below; Close-up view of cuticular structure; the tergum is cut, so that the cavities beneath the grooves are visible,



================================================================================

Psyche
[December
Figure 8.
Schematic illustration of tergal and sternal glands in Leptogenys. (Lettering as in Fig. 5; sg = sternal gland; ge = glandular epithelium; ppg = post- pygidial gland; pg = pygidial gland).




================================================================================

9781 Hdldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 309 Figure 9.
Above: Sagital section through pygidial gland and postpygidial gland. with large reservoirs of Rhvsidoponera penhensn, Below: Postpygidial gland only; note the glandular cells with channels. (Lettering as in Fig. 8; R = reservoir).



================================================================================

310 Psyche [December
Figure 10.
Above: Sagital section through pygidial gland and postpygidial gland of Piectrocrena strigosa. Below: Pygidial gland. (Lettering as in Fig. 5; PPG= postpygidial gland; PG = pygidial gland; R = reservoir).



================================================================================

19781 Hulldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 311 Figure !I.
Above: Sagital section through the pygidial gland of Pldyilivrea cribinoda. I he large reservoir is folded in this section. Each cell cluster contains 50-70 cells. Below: Section through postpygidial gland of P. cribinoda: each duster contains 15-20 ceils. (Lettering as in Fig. 3).



================================================================================

312 Psyche [December
Figure 12. Above: Sagital section through sternal gland between 5 and 6'h sterna of Leptogenvs neutralis. Usually the 6' sternum has a distinct cuticular structure (CS), very similar to that on the 7"' tergum. Below: Section through both sternal glands (Between 5"' and 6^, and 6" and ?%term) of Leptogenys nitida. (Lettering as in Fig. 5; R = reservoir).



================================================================================

19781 Holldohler & Engel - Glands in Ants 313 Figure I."!. SEM photograph of the sternal gland area between the 6"' and 7" sterna of Paltorh,~reus tarsums. The picture below is an enlargement of the lighter rectangle in the picture above. The openings of the glandular cell channels in the intersegmentai membrane are clearly visible,



================================================================================

314 Psyche
[December
Figure 14.
Above: SEM photograph of the glandular cell openings of the sternal gland of Pahothyreus tarsatus, Note the filament-iike protrusions of the interseg- mental membrane. Below: Sagital section through the same area. (Lettering as in Fig. 5).




================================================================================

19781 Holldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 315 Figure IS.
"Sting g!ands" of M,vrtwciu pi!osda (above) and Amb[vopone pullipes (below). (htermg as in Fig. 5).



================================================================================

316 Psyche
[December
Figure 16.
Glands assocfated with the sting sheath, Above: Sagital secnon through sheath valve with glandular cluster and cham el^ in Vdonfommj~w haemu- ~oda. Below: Myrmecia piiudu. (Lettering as in Fig. 5).



================================================================================

19781 Hol~dabler & Engel - Glands in Ants 3 17 -r
-
Figure 17.
Glands associated with sting sheat
Sagital section through glandular cells with chann ghndular cell cluster with channels. (Lettering as



================================================================================

Psyche
Figure 18.
Glandular .cell clusters in the 7"' abdominal sternum of Nu~omessor co~kerelli (above) and Veromessor pergundei (below). GE = glandular epithelium in the TCh sternum. (Lettering as in Fig. 5).



================================================================================

19781 Holldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 319 Figure 19. SEM photograph of the 7''' tcrgum of Puchj*con&/u (=Term!!opune) Iuevigcrto. Glandular applicator surfacc (GA) is shown in greater detail in the picture below.




================================================================================

320 Psyche [December
Figure 20. Above: Sagital section through the pygidial gland of Pac~~vcmclvla (=Termisupone) taevigata. Below: SEM photograph oft he cuticular structure (GA in Fig. 19) on 7"' tergum. The cut open area shows the largecavitiesassociated with the structure. (Lettering as in Fig. 5 and Fig. 18).



================================================================================

19781 Hoftdobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 32 1 Figure 21.
Sagital section through the gaster of Odonromachus haemfoda, showing the well developed reservoir of the pygidial gland (PG).



================================================================================

Psyche
[December
-
Figure 22. Above: Sagital section through the gastfr (if Neivamyrmexnigrescens. showing the pygidial gland (PO), postpygidialgland (PPG) andanus(A). Below: Close up of sagital section through pygidial gland and postpygidial gland of N. nigresrens. (Lettering as in Figs. 5 and 8; R = reservoir).



================================================================================

19781 Hdldobler & Engel - Glands in Ants 323 Figure 23.
Above: SEM photograph of tip of the gaster of Etiton hamatum. Below: Sagitat section through the same segments. (Lettering as in Fig. 8; S = sting; GE = glandular epithelium in 7 sternum).



================================================================================

324 Psyche [December
Figure 24,
Eciton hamturn: SEM photograph of the intersegmental membrane between 6'h and 7"' terga, where the pygidialglandq open. Below: Close up of the brush- like structure.




================================================================================

19781 Holldobler & Engd - Glands in Ants 325 Figure 25.
Schematic drawings of sagital sections through the gaster tips of Doryh tnofesra (left) and Ecitun howmum (right). (Lettering as in Fig. & a = anus; ag = anus glands).
Figure 26. Sagital seAon through anus of Dor.vhs mdestu worker; AG = anus gland; A = anus.




================================================================================

326 Psyche [December




================================================================================

19781 Holldobler & EngeI - Glands in Ants 327 Figure 28. Above: SEM photograph of abdominal tip of Liomempum apicu- kmm. "PG"' indicates where the- pyadta! gland opens hetween 6Ih and 7Ih terga. *A" indicates opening of anus; SG = sternal gland (Pavan's gland). Below Sagital section through gaster of L apicdatum. PG = reservoir of pygidial gland; 7. = 7' tergum.




================================================================================

Psyche [December
ALTENKIRCH, G.
1962.
Untersuchungen uber die Morphologie der abdominalen Hautdrusen einheimischer Apiden (Insecta, Hymenoptera) Zoologische Beitrage, 7, 161-238.
BERNSTEIN, R. A.
1974. Seasonal food abundance and foraging activity in some desert ants. The American Naturalist, 108, 490-498.
BLUM, M. S.
1966. The source and specificity of trail pheromones in Termitopone, Mono- morium and Huberia, and their relation to those of some other ants. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 41, 155- 160.
1977. Behavioral responses of Hymenoptera to pheromones and allomones. Pp. 149-167 in Shorey, H. H. and J. J. McKelvey, Jr. (ed): Chemical control of insect behavior. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1977. BLUM, M. s. AND H. R. HERMANN.
1978a. Venoms and venom apparatuses of the Formicidae: Myrmeciinae, Ponerinae, Dorylinae, Pseudomyrmecinae, Myrmicinae and Formici- nae. In: G. V. R. Born, 0. Eichler, A. Farah, H. Heiken, A. D. Welch (ed). Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Springer-Verlag, Hei- delberg 1978, pp. 801-869.
BLUM, M. s. AND H. R. HERMANN.
1978b. Venoms and venom apparatuses of the Formicidae: Dolichoderinae and Aneuretinae. In: Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Springer- Verlag, pp. 87 1-894.
BLUM, M. s. AND c. A. PORTOCARRERO.
1964. Chemical releasers of social behavior. IV. The hindgut as the source of the odor trail pheromone in the neotropical army ant genus Ecizon. Ann. Entomol. SOC. America 57, 793-794.
BORDAS, L.
1895. Appareil glandulaire des Hymenopteres. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. 19, 289- 344.
BROWN, c. A., J. F. WATKINS 11 AND D. w. ELDRIDGE. 1979. Depression of bacteria and fungi by the army ant secretion: Skatole. J. Kansas Entomol. SOC. 52, 119-122.
CHADAB, R. AND c. RETTENMEYER.
1975. Mass recruitment by army ants. Science 188, 1124-1 125. H~LLDOBLER, B.
1978. Ethological aspects of chemical communication in ants. Advances in the Study of Behavior 8, 75-1 15.
HOLLDOBLER, B., M. MOGLICH AND U. MASCHWITZ. 1973.
Bothroponera tesserinoda (Formicidae): Tandemlauf beim Nestumzug. Encyclopaedia Cinematographica E 2040, pp. 3-14. HOLLDOBLER, B., R. STANTON AND H. ENGEL. 1976.
A new exocrine gland in Novomessor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its possible significance as a taxonomic character. Psyche, 83, 32-41.



================================================================================

19781 Holldob~er & Engel - Glands in Ants 329 HOLLDOBLER, B. AND c. P. HASKINS.
1977.
Sexual calling behavior in primitive ants. Science, 195, 793-794. HOLLDOBLER, B. AND E. 0. WILSON.
1977.
Weaver ants: Social establishment and maintenance of territory. Science, 195, 900-902.
HOLLDOBLER, B. AND E. 0. WILSON.
1978.
The multiple recruitment systems of the African weaver ant Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Socio- biol. 3, 19-60.
JANET, CH.
1898.
Etudes sur les Fourmis, les Guepes et les Abeilles Note 17: Systkme glandulaire tkgumentaire de la Myrmica rubra. Observations diverses sur les Fourmis. Paris, Georges Carre et C. Nand, Editeurs. KOSCHEVNIKOV, G. A.
1899.
Zur Kenntnis der Hautdrusen der Apidae und Vespidae. Anat. Anz. 15, 5 19-528.
KUGLER, CH.
1978.
Pygidial glands in the myrmicine ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes sociaux, 25, 267-274.
MASCHWITZ, U.
1964.
Gefahrenalarmstoffe und Gefahrenalarmierung bei sozialen Hymenop- teren. Z. vergl. Physiol. 47, 596-655.
MASCHWITZ, u., B. HOLLDOBLER AND M. MOGLICH. 1974.
Tandemlaufen als Rekrutierungsverhalten bei Bothroponera tesserinoda Fore1 (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Z. Tierpsychol. 35, 1 13- 123. MASCHW~TZ, u. AND w. KLOFT.
1971.
Morphology and function of the venom apparatus of insects - bees, wasps, ants and caterpillars. In: Venomous animals and their venoms 3, 1-60.
MASCHWITZ, u. AND P. SCHONEGGE.
1977.
Recruitment gland of Leptogenys chinensis. Naturwissenschaften, 64, 589-590.
PAVAN, M. AND G. RONCHETTI.
1955. Studi sulla morfologia esterna e anatomia interna dell'operaia di Iri- domyrmex humilis Mayr e ricerche chimiche e biologiche sulla iri- domirmecina. Atti della Societa Italiana di Scienze Naturali, Milano, 94, 379-477.
RATHMAYER, W.
1962. Methylmetacrylat als Einbettungsmedium fur Insekten Experientia (Basel) 18, 47-48.
1962. Das Paralysierungsproblem beim Bienenwolf Philanthus triangulum F. (Hym. Sphec.) Z. vergl. Physiol 45, 413-462. ROBERTSON, P. L.
1968. A morphological and functional study of the venom apparatus in repre- sentatives of some major groups of Hymenoptera. Aust. J. Zool. 16, 133-166.
ROMEIS, B.
1948. Mikroskopische Technik. Munchen 1948.



================================================================================

330 Psyche [December
TAYLOR, R. W.
1978.
Nothomyrmecia macrops: A living-fossil ant rediscovered. Science 201, 979-985.
TOPOFF, H. AND J. MIRENDA.
1975.
Trail-following by the army ant Neivamyrmex nigrescens: Responses by workers to volatile odors Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 68, 1044-1046. WATKINS, J. F.
1964.
Laboratory experiments on the trail following of army ants of the genus Neivamyrmex (Formicidae: Dorylinae). J. Kansas Entomol. SOC. 37, 22-28.
WATKINS, J. F., T. w. COLE AND R. s. BALDRIDGE. 1967.
Laboratory studies on interspecific trail following and trail preference of army ants (Dorylinae). J. Kansas Entomol. SOC. 40, 146-151. WATKINS, J. F., F. R. GEHLBACH AND J. c. KROLL. 1969. Attractant-repellent secretions in blind snakes (Leptotyphlops dulcis) and army ants (Neivamyrmex nigrescens). Ecology 50, 1098-1 102. WENT, F. w., J. WHEELER AND G. c. WHEELER. 1972.
Feeding and digestion in some ants (Veromessor and Monica). Bio- science 22, 82-88.
WHEELER, J. AND s. w. RISSING.
1975. Natural history of Veromessor pergandei - 11. Behavior. The Pan- Pacific Entomologist 51, 303-314.
WHELDEN, R. M.
1957.
Notes on the anatomy of Rhytidoponera convexa Mayr ("violacea" Forel) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Entomol. SOC. Amer. 50, 27 1-282.
1957.
Notes on the anatomy of the Formicidae I. Stigmatomma pallipes (Haldeman). J. New York Entomol. Soc. 65, 1-21. 1960. The anatomy of Rhytidoponera metallica F. Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Entmol. SOC. Amer. 53, 793-808. 1963.
The anatomy of adult queen and workers of the army ants Eciton burchelli Westwood and Eciton hamatum Fabricius. New York Entomol. SOC. 71, 90-1 15.
WILSON, E. 0.
1971.
The insect societies. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.




================================================================================