Cambridge Entomological Club, 1874
PSYCHE

A Journal of Entomology

founded in 1874 by the Cambridge Entomological Club
Quick search

Print ISSN 0033-2615
This is the CEC archive of Psyche through 2000. Psyche is now published by Hindawi Publishing.

E. P. Van Duzee.
Notes on Genus Hyoidea Puton (Hemiptera).
Psyche 23(5):141, 1916.

This article at Hindawi Publishing: https://doi.org/10.1155/1916/27362
CEC's scan of this article: http://psyche.entclub.org/pdf/23/23-141.pdf, 72K
This landing page: http://psyche.entclub.org/23/23-141.html


The following unprocessed text is extracted automatically from the PDF file, and is likely to be both incomplete and full of errors. Please consult the PDF file for the complete article.

19161 Van DUZM-Note on Genus Hyoidea Puton 141 NOTE ON GENUS HYOIDEA PUTON (HEMIPTERA). BY E. P. VAN DUZEE,
Berkeley, California.
Mr. Otto Heidemann has very kindly sent to me for examina- tion a cotype of Hyoidea horvathi Montd. and a careful examina- tion of this confirms my assignment of this genus and Bolteria Uhler in my synoptical tables of the Miridse recently published by the University of California and in the Check List of the He- miptera, in both of which I drop Hyoidea as wanting in our fauna and arrange Bolteria in the Phylini near Plagiognathus. Dr. Reu- ter did not know Bolteria amicta, the type of the genus, but placed picta in Hyoidea and described a new species g~isea. An exami- nation of fresh material of picta shows that it wants the free con- verging arolia found in Hyoidea and must be placed in Subfamily Phylinse.
It is probably safe to assume that amicta is congeneric with picta although the type is lost and so far as I know the species is now unrecognized.
I am also indebted to Mr. Heidemann for the opportunity of examining typical examples of Hyoidea grisea Reuter, and, as Mr. Heidemann suggests in his letter to me, this proves to be a synonym of Labopidea chloriza Uhler. I am, however, convinced that both chloriza and grisea are identical with the earlier described Tini- cephalus simplex Uhler and that we must use the generic name Labopidea for the species. Hyoidea differs from Labopidea in having a more polished surface with punctured pronotum, a longer and more parallel form with the pronotum but little wider behind, and a sharp and carinate hind margin to the vertex. The aspect of Hyoidea is quite different from Labopidea and I believe it should be considered distinct. Both of these genera have free converg- ing arolia and belong to the Orthotylini.



================================================================================


Volume 23 table of contents